Download Belief and Resistance: Dynamics of Contemporary Intellectual by Barbara Herrnstein Smith PDF

By Barbara Herrnstein Smith

Fact, cause, and objectivity--can we live on with no them? What occurs to legislations, technology, and the pursuit of social justice while such principles and beliefs are rejected? those questions are on the center of the controversies among traditionalists and "postmodernists" that Barbara Herrnstein Smith examines in her wide-ranging ebook, which additionally deals an unique standpoint at the perennial--perhaps eternal--clash of trust and skepticism, on our desire for highbrow balance and our event of its inevitable disruption. targeting the together troublesome impasses to which those controversies usually lead and at the charges--"absurdity," "irrationalism," "complicity," "blindness," "stubbornness"--that quite often accompany them, Smith stresses our tendency to provide self-flattering purposes for our personal ideals and to or demonize the factors of these who disagree with us. Her account of the ensuing cognitive and rhetorical dynamics of highbrow clash attracts on contemporary examine and thought in evolutionary biology, neuroscience, developmental psychology, and the historical past and sociology of technology, in addition to on modern philosophy and language idea. Smith's analyses take her into very important ongoing debates over the opportunity of an target grounding of felony and political judgments, the continued price of Enlightenment rationalism, major demanding situations to dominant principles of medical fact, and correct responses to denials of the factuality of the Holocaust. As she explores those and different controversies, Smith develops clean how you can comprehend their reasons and energies, and extra confident how you can see the operations of highbrow clash extra mostly.

Show description

Read Online or Download Belief and Resistance: Dynamics of Contemporary Intellectual Controversy PDF

Similar literary theory books

The Flesh of Words: The Politics of Writing

This new selection of demanding literary reviews performs with a foundational definition of Western tradition: the be aware develop into flesh. however the note turn into flesh isn't, or not, a theological already-given. it's a millennial objective or telos towards which each and every textual content strives. either witty and immensely erudite, Jacques Rancière leads the serious reader via a maze of arrivals towards the instant, might be continuously suspended, while the notice reveals its flesh.

Hermeneutic Desire and Critical Rewriting: Narrative Interpretation in the Wake of Poststructuralism

Ranging from a accomplished exam of present post-structuralist and socio-semiotic theories of narrative, this booklet formulates an interactive version of literary interpretation and pedagogy emphasizing strategy, severe self-awareness and techniques of re-reading/re-writing. A literary pedagogy premised at the thought of "rewriting", the writer argues, will allow readers to event the method of narrative and significant development creatively.

Invisible listeners : lyric intimacy in Herbert, Whitman, and Ashbery

Whilst a poet addresses a dwelling person--whether pal or enemy, lover or sister--we realize the expression of intimacy. yet what impels poets to jump throughout time and house to talk to invisible listeners, looking an awesome intimacy--George Herbert with God, Walt Whitman with a reader sooner or later, John Ashbery with the Renaissance painter Francesco Parmigianino?

Additional info for Belief and Resistance: Dynamics of Contemporary Intellectual Controversy

Sample text

II: however, one's goal is constructing knowledge and not just registering publicly the strength of one's own convictions, then such efforts-including, as required, the pursuit of further resources-are necessary. They are necessary not because postmodern theorists put truth, fact, and history in quotation marks or because sophomoric egalitarians announce that all opinions are equally valid, but because the affirmation of and appeal to truth, fact, and history cannot and never did, in themselves, turn that kind of trick.

2o The sort of discursive breakdown that concerns Lyotard is illustrated well enough by Norris's own failed engagement with just that point. According to Norris, Lyotard's claims regarding the limited force and scope oflogical and discursive norms (or, in Norris's terms, of "argued responsible debate") follow only "ifwe accept Lyotard's major premise, namely that the various speech-act 'genres' ... " He continues: 'What [Lyotard] thus fails to recognize-for reasons bound up with his doctrinaire postmodernist stance-is the fact that in the great majority of cases there is no such conflict between truth-telling motives ...

II: however, one's goal is constructing knowledge and not just registering publicly the strength of one's own convictions, then such efforts-including, as required, the pursuit of further resources-are necessary. They are necessary not because postmodern theorists put truth, fact, and history in quotation marks or because sophomoric egalitarians announce that all opinions are equally valid, but because the affirmation of and appeal to truth, fact, and history cannot and never did, in themselves, turn that kind of trick.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.37 of 5 – based on 46 votes