Download Deleuze and Language by Jean-Jacques Lecercle (auth.) PDF
By Jean-Jacques Lecercle (auth.)
Read or Download Deleuze and Language PDF
Similar literary theory books
This new number of tough literary experiences performs with a foundational definition of Western tradition: the notice turn into flesh. however the note develop into flesh isn't, or not, a theological already-given. it's a millennial aim or telos towards which each and every textual content strives. either witty and immensely erudite, Jacques Rancière leads the serious reader via a maze of arrivals towards the instant, probably continually suspended, whilst the observe reveals its flesh.
Ranging from a entire exam of present post-structuralist and socio-semiotic theories of narrative, this ebook formulates an interactive version of literary interpretation and pedagogy emphasizing technique, severe self-awareness and techniques of re-reading/re-writing. A literary pedagogy premised at the notion of "rewriting", the writer argues, will permit readers to adventure the method of narrative and significant development creatively.
While a poet addresses a residing person--whether pal or enemy, lover or sister--we realize the expression of intimacy. yet what impels poets to jump throughout time and house to talk to invisible listeners, looking an excellent intimacy--George Herbert with God, Walt Whitman with a reader sooner or later, John Ashbery with the Renaissance painter Francesco Parmigianino?
- Rhetoric, Hermeneutics, and Translation in the Middle Ages: Academic Traditions and Vernacular Texts
- Disability in science fiction : representations of technology as cure
- Doing English :Guide for Literature Students (Routledge)
- Deceit, Desire and the Novel: Self and Other in Literary Structure
Additional info for Deleuze and Language
This is the position of Lestrade (in The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes), who wishes to arrest somebody, whether he is the culprit or not, and of Dr Watson, who exults in the results achieved by his friend; this is not the position of Sherlock Holmes himself, even less of his elder brother Mycroft, the real genius, who mulls over the problems and never goes on all fours to collect fragments of ash in order to come closer to the solution and establish proof. As we all know, what is interesting in a Sherlock Holmes story is not the solution (which is always a disappointment and announces the death of the text), it is the problem: why should a red-headed shopkeeper be employed to copy the Encyclopaedia Britannica for three hours every afternoon?
That Deleuze shares this view, that he is in a sense a disciple of Bergson (he contributed to the revival of a philosopher whom the positivist tradition of structuralism despised) is clear. Like Badiou (who calls such people sophists), he intensely dislikes the Anglo-Saxon exponents of the linguistic turn in philosophy, most notably Wittgenstein (against whom he uses violent and uncontrolled words in his Abecedaire28 ): for him the idea that all philosophical problems might be grammatical problems is anathema.
Deleuze once said that, in their common books, one of them wrote the sketch of a chapter, and the other developed it. Whether this is fact or legend is irrelevant here: in both cases it marks the depth and seriousness of their collaboration. All this is still not fair enough to Guattari. The problem is: having admitted they were Siamese twins of equal vivaciousness, how can we separate them, and discern, beyond the general indications given by Deleuze, Guattari's specific contribution? It would appear that we cannot, and no careful reading of L'Anti-CEdipe and Mille plateaux will yield indications susceptible of proof, as opposed to vague feelings and arbitrary decision, of what is to be ascribed to whom.